Comparison
Today’s investment teams face increasing pressure to move faster, analyze more data, and make sharper decisions — without scaling headcount. Traditional analysts and generic AI tools can help, but they fall short on speed, consistency, and integration.
Kruncher ingests your data, applies your criteria, and delivers
insights in minutes — not days.
Below, we compare Kruncher with legacy approaches.
| Analysis | Human Analyst | Generic AI Tools (ie ChatGPT) |  (AI Analyst) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | DaysTraditional manual analysis with deep research required. | HoursRequires continuous iteration and a human should lead the interaction. | MinutesDesigned For Company’s Data Ingestion, Enrichment and Analysis with instant results. |
| Accuracy | High Accuracy / BiasedSenior Analyst judgment provides nuanced understanding, but error might still happen. | Variable (Avg 80%+)Accuracy decrease when document, charts and tables increase | 95%+ AccuracyKruncher makes one LLM interaction for each request to avoid hallucinations |
| Dept | LimitedRestricted by human processing capacity | LimitedPublic available information and specific docs configured by user | ComprehensiveIntegration with 20 premium data sources, your CRM, Your Investment Criteria and Your GDrive |
| Setup | TrainingA senior team member needs to spend hours to train, verify work and provide feedbacks | Prompt EngineeringSpend time to improve prompts and condensate knowledge in a machine understandable way | Ready On-Day-One; Available 24/7After 30 minutes configuration Kruncher is available for you |
| Data Science | Limited BudgetUsually Economics graduates have limited knowledge of data-science | Limited Data And CapabilitiesDo not have access to CRM and fund full-datasets in a machine readable way | NativeCan create custom Scoring Models, compares Companies, Leverage Portfolio Data to take better screening decisions |
